Partner Onboarding and Offboarding Process
Purpose
This process defines how partners enter, become active, stay useful, or are removed from the Eprenz ecosystem.
Partner onboarding is not only collecting a logo or affiliate link.
A partner is onboarded only when Eprenz knows:
- what founder problem the partner solves
- which founder stage the partner supports
- which country or region the partner serves
- where the partner should appear
- how member engagement will be tracked
- how revenue or referral value will be tracked
- who owns the relationship
- whether the partner is ready for OS placement
Core Principle
Partners should be onboarded around founder problems, not around vendor categories.
The process should answer:
Founder problem
→ partner fit
→ required data
→ agreement or tracking setup
→ placement surface
→ activation
→ results review
→ continue, improve, or offboard
Partner Lifecycle
flowchart TD
A[Partner Identified] --> B[Fit Review]
B --> C[Onboarding]
C --> D[OS Ready Check]
D --> E[Placement]
E --> F[Activation]
F --> G[Results Tracking]
G --> H{Review}
H --> I[Continue]
H --> J[Improve]
H --> K[Offboard]
Partner Statuses
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Identified | Partner is known but not reviewed yet |
| Researching | Team is checking fit, program, terms, and relevance |
| Applied | Eprenz has applied to partner program or started outreach |
| Pending | Waiting for partner response or approval |
| Approved | Partner has approved Eprenz or agreed to participate |
| Active | Partner is live and can be shown to members |
| OS Ready | Partner has enough data to be placed inside the OS |
| Needs Review | Partner is incomplete, outdated, unclear, or not yet usable |
| Paused | Partner is temporarily hidden or not being promoted |
| Offboarded | Partner is removed from active use |
| Rejected | Partner declined, application failed, or partner is not suitable |
Onboarding Types
There are different partner entry paths.
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| New affiliate partner | A partner Eprenz applies to or joins through an affiliate program | software, SaaS, platform |
| Solution partner | A service provider or expert who solves founder problems | legal, finance, marketing |
| Global partner | A strategic ecosystem partner with broader relationship value | major platform or institution |
| Sponsor | A company supporting GFIS or other Eprenz events | event sponsor |
| Advisor partner | A person or firm providing expert support | CFO, legal, exit advisor |
| Existing partner cleanup | A partner already in the sheet but not fully verified | old affiliate, partial signup |
When to Onboard a Partner
A partner should be onboarded when at least one of these is true:
- founder demand is repeated
- the partner solves a recognized founder problem
- the partner fills a gap in Start, Grow, Profit, or Exit
- the partner supports an important country or region
- the partner can be placed in knowledge, events, network, or OS surfaces
- the partner has a clear affiliate, referral, sponsor, or strategic value
- the partner improves the founder experience
A partner should not be onboarded only because a program exists.
Onboarding Process
Step 1, Identify the Need
Start from the founder problem.
Examples:
| Founder need | Possible partner category |
|---|---|
| I need a website | website builder, hosting, domain |
| I need payments | payment processor, checkout tool |
| I need a business bank account | banking, fintech |
| I need more customers | CRM, email marketing, sales tool |
| I need legal protection | legal service, IP advisor |
| I need cash flow clarity | accounting, bookkeeping, CFO |
| I need networking | event partner, community partner |
| I need funding | lender, investor network, funding readiness advisor |
Step 2, Check Existing Partner Coverage
Before finding a new partner, check the current partner or affiliate sheet.
Ask:
- Do we already have a partner for this problem?
- Is the partner active?
- Is the partner still relevant?
- Does the partner support the founder country?
- Is tracking available?
- Is the partner ready to be shown inside the OS?
- Is there a better alternative?
Step 3, Review Partner Fit
Use these criteria:
| Criteria | Question |
|---|---|
| Problem fit | What founder problem does this partner solve? |
| Stage fit | Does this support Start, Grow, Profit, Exit, or multiple stages? |
| Country fit | Which countries or regions does this partner support? |
| Trust fit | Is this partner credible enough for Eprenz to present? |
| Content fit | Can this partner support a guide, checklist, event, or knowledge page? |
| Tracking fit | Can engagement, referral, or revenue be tracked? |
| Revenue fit | Is there affiliate, referral, sponsor, or strategic value? |
| Brand fit | Does the partner support Eprenz positioning without confusing it? |
Step 4, Collect Required Partner Data
Every active partner should have these fields.
| Field | Required? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Partner name | Yes | identify the partner |
| Website | Yes | source and user destination |
| Partner type | Yes | affiliate, solution partner, sponsor, advisor, global partner |
| Partner category | Yes | banking, payments, legal, website, CRM, etc. |
| Founder problem solved | Yes | problem-first placement |
| Stage fit | Yes | Start, Grow, Profit, Exit |
| Supported countries | Yes | country routing |
| Primary market | Yes | strongest region |
| Partner program link | If applicable | affiliate or referral setup |
| Tracking link or code | If applicable | engagement and revenue tracking |
| Agreement status | Yes | standard terms, custom, missing, not needed |
| Agreement location | If applicable | where terms are stored |
| Contact person | Yes | relationship owner or partner contact |
| Internal owner | Yes | Eprenz owner |
| Placement surface | Yes | OS, Mighty, events, network, email, partner page |
| User-facing rationale | Yes | why this partner is shown |
| Status | Yes | active, pending, paused, offboarded |
| Notes | Optional | context and next action |
Step 5, Set Up Agreement and Tracking
Before a partner is active, define:
- whether standard affiliate terms are enough
- whether a custom agreement is required
- who accepted the terms
- where the agreement or terms are stored
- which link, code, or dashboard tracks referrals
- how revenue will be reported
- who checks results
If tracking does not exist, the partner can still be useful, but it should be marked clearly.
Step 6, Decide Placement
A partner should be placed where it helps the founder act.
| Placement Surface | When to use |
|---|---|
| Partner page | when founder is searching for providers |
| Home page | when the partner supports a priority next action |
| Compass result | when the problem is detected directly |
| Mighty knowledge layer | when the partner supports a guide or lesson |
| Learning content | after a checklist, guide, or decision page |
| Event | when partner can teach or activate a topic |
| Network | when partner supports relationships, rooms, or introductions |
| Advisor follow-up | when human judgment is needed before recommendation |
| Email follow-up | when the user expressed a specific survey or Compass need |
Step 7, Mark OS Readiness
A partner is OS ready only when the following are clear:
- problem solved
- stage fit
- country fit
- placement surface
- tracking method
- status
- agreement status
- owner
- user-facing rationale
If any of these are missing, mark the partner as Needs Review.
Step 8, Activate the Partner
Activation can happen through:
- partner page listing
- knowledge page placement
- comparison chart
- checklist recommendation
- event or workshop
- network room
- email follow-up
- co-announcement
- advisor referral
- Compass result
Activation should always connect back to a founder problem.
Offboarding Process
Offboarding means removing, pausing, or hiding a partner from active Eprenz placement.
A partner should be offboarded or paused when:
- the partner no longer solves a relevant founder problem
- the partner program is inactive
- the partner link is broken
- tracking no longer works
- the partner does not support the claimed country or market
- the partner creates poor member experience
- the partner conflicts with Eprenz positioning
- agreement terms are unclear or unacceptable
- the partner is replaced by a better option
- the partner requests removal
- the relationship is inactive and not worth maintaining
Offboarding Steps
flowchart TD
A[Issue Found] --> B[Review Partner]
B --> C{Keep, Pause, or Remove?}
C --> D[Keep and Update]
C --> E[Pause Placement]
C --> F[Offboard]
E --> G[Hide from OS Surfaces]
F --> G
G --> H[Update Sheet]
H --> I[Record Reason]
Step 1, Identify the Issue
The issue may come from:
- broken link
- no engagement
- no revenue
- poor member feedback
- outdated offer
- unsupported country
- rejected application
- unclear ownership
- partner no longer aligned
Step 2, Decide Status
| Decision | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Keep | partner remains active |
| Improve | partner stays active but needs updates |
| Pause | partner is hidden temporarily |
| Offboard | partner is removed from active use |
| Replace | partner is replaced by a better option |
Step 3, Remove or Pause Placement
Update every location where the partner appears:
- Partner page
- Compass results
- Home page
- Mighty content
- Learning content
- Events
- Network
- Email templates
- Advisor notes
- Comparison charts
Step 4, Update Records
The affiliate or partner sheet should record:
- new status
- reason for offboarding
- date removed or paused
- owner
- replacement partner, if any
- notes for future review
Current Partner Cleanup
Existing partners and partially completed partnerships should go through the same lifecycle.
For each current partner, ask:
| Question | Outcome |
|---|---|
| What problem does this partner solve? | problem tag |
| Which stage does this partner fit? | stage tag |
| Which countries does it support? | country tag |
| Is the partner active? | status |
| Do we have tracking? | tracking status |
| Do we have agreement or terms? | agreement status |
| Where should it appear? | placement surface |
| Is it OS ready? | ready, needs review, not ready |
Phase 3 Output
This page should produce:
- partner lifecycle statuses
- onboarding process
- offboarding process
- partner data requirements
- OS readiness criteria
- current partner cleanup logic
- clear boundary for what gets tracked
Open Questions
- Who owns partner onboarding internally?
- Who owns partner offboarding decisions?
- Where are agreements stored?
- Where are affiliate logins stored?
- Who checks broken links and inactive partners?
- How often should partners be reviewed?
- What revenue threshold makes a partner worth keeping?
- Should all partners be shown publicly or only after Compass?
- Should low-confidence partners be hidden from users?
- Who approves a partner as OS ready?